Clinical trial cost benchmarking: white paper

Clinical trial cost benchmarking: white paper

Estimating the total cost of a clinical trial before it runs is challenging. Public data on past trial costs can be hard to come by, as many companies guard this information carefully. Trials in high income countries and low and middle income countries have very different costs.

Upload your clinical trial protocol and create a cost benchmark with AI

Protocol to cost benchmark

The Clinical Trial Risk Tool uses AI and Natural Language Processing (NLP) to estimate the cost of a trial using the information contained in the clinical trial protocol.

The Clinical Trial Risk Tool provides a solution. You can upload the protocol or synopsis and it will generate a cost benchmark using similar comparable trials from a public database of grants, and build a basket of comparable trials. This technique is called reference class forecasting, and was developed by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky and helped Kahneman win the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2002.

You can find out more in our white paper.

Try looking up your own trial

Trial Cost Benchmarking Demo

For full functionality please try uploading your protocol to the Clinical Trial Risk Tool. The tool will extract the below information and many more parameters from the PDF and use this to model the trial cost for benchmarking purposes.

Projection

$0

Range:

Comparable Trials

References

  1. Theresia, Yiallourou, et al. “Cost Drivers and Predictive Modeling of Clinical Trial Costs: Analysis of 101 Global Health Trials.” VeriXiv 2.152 (2025): 152.
  2. DiMasi JA, Hansen RW, Grabowski HG: The price of innovation: New estimates of drug development costs. J. Health Econ. 2003; 22: 151–185.
  3. DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG, Hansen RW: Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimate of R&D costs. J. Health Econ. 2016; 47: 20–33
  4. Young R, Bekele T, Gunn A, et al.: Developing new health technologies for neglected diseases: A pipeline portfolio review and cost model. Gates Open Research. 2020; 2.
  5. Martin L, Hutchens M, Hawkins C, et al.: How much do clinical trials cost? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2017; 16: 381–382
  6. Flyvbjerg, Bent. Curbing optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation in planning: Reference class forecasting in practice. European planning studies 16.1 (2008): 3-21.

Clinical trial cost benchmarking

Clinical trial cost benchmarking

You can download a white paper about clinical trial cost benchmarking here Estimating the total cost of a clinical trial before it runs is challenging. Public data on past trial costs can be hard to come by, as many companies guard this information carefully. Trials in high income countries and low and middle income countries have very different costs. Clinical trial costs are not normally distributed.[1] I took a dataset of just over 10,000 US-funded trials.

Clinical study budget templates and generators - best practices to follow

Clinical study budget templates and generators - best practices to follow

Guest post by Safeer Khan, Lecturer at Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan Introduction The success of clinical studies relies heavily on proper financial planning and budgeting. These processes directly impact key factors such as project timelines, resource allocation, and compliance with regulatory requirements. The accurate forecasting of costs for clinical trials, however, is a highly complex and resource-intensive process. A study by the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development found that the average cost of developing a new drug is approximately $2.

The anatomy of an oncology clinical trial protocol

The anatomy of an oncology clinical trial protocol

Guest post by Safeer Khan, Lecturer at Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan Introduction Recent years have seen a substantial rise in oncology clinical trials, with annual growth exceeding 260 studies on average [1]. Despite this increase, these studies continue to be some of the most demanding and resource-intensive in clinical research. The combination of intensive monitoring, detailed assessment schedules, and highly specific eligibility criteria creates substantial operational challenges.