We have developed a machine learning and rule-based tool using natural language processing which allows a user to upload a trial protocol, and which categorises the protocol as high, medium or low risk of ending uninformatively. The tool is at https://clinicaltrialrisk.org/tool and is open-sourced on Github. You can read an explanation of how the tool works here, and a description of how we validated its accuracy here.
There are several indicators of high risk of uninformativeness which can be identified in a protocol, such as a lack of and or an inadequate statistical analysis plan, use of non-standard endpoints, or the use of cluster randomisation. One of the most common causes of a trial ending uninformatively is underpowering. Low-risk trials are often run by well-known institutions with external funding and an international or intercontinental array of sites. These indicators can be referred to as features or parameters.
This project is an initial Proof of Concept (POC) which to showcase what is possible with natural language processing, with a view to moving towards a more comprehensive main project which may identify a more complete set of cost, complexity, or uninformativeness risk factors.
The tool is designed with a feedback form so that inaccurate data extractions can be reported back to the developers.
In addition the MIT License means that you are free to add features or extend the scope of the tool.
We hope that researchers who are considering submitting a protocol of a trial to a prospective source of funding will be able to use the tool as a kind of checklist to ensure that their trial is designed to reduce risk and increase the prospects of being funded.
Guest post by Youssef Soliman, medical student at Assiut University and biostatistician Designing a high-quality clinical trial protocol is critical for the success of any study. A protocol is the blueprint that outlines every aspect of a trial. In an ideal world, a flawless protocol would require no revisions and include only essential elements. In reality, however, the average protocol undergoes 2–3 amendments and often contains excessive data collection and overly complex entry criteria.
Clinical trials have long been the foundation of medical breakthroughs, but traditional methods often stumble over slow timelines, high costs, and difficulties in finding the right participants. Artificial intelligence (AI) — a technology ready to transform this landscape by making trials faster, more affordable, and smarter. The accelerating adoption of AI in clinical trials signals a major shift in healthcare research. It is already making significant strides in transforming clinical trials.
Guest post by Safeer Khan, Lecturer at Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan In clinical trials, a staggering 80% encounter delays during the startup phase and 37% struggle to meet enrollment targets. Read more Key clinical trial statistics. These figures highlight a critical, yet often underemphasized, aspect of clinical trials—the feasibility process. The feasibility process is essential for assessing the practicality of a clinical trial’s design, ensuring the study is prepared to tackle the challenges that may arise.
