Coming out soon
We have developed an AI tool called the Clinical Trial Risk Tool which allows a user to upload a trial protocol and which categorises the protocol as high, medium, or low risk of ending without delivering informative results.
When a pharmaceutical company develops a drug, it needs to pass through several phases of clinical trials before it can be approved by regulators.
Before the trial is run, the drug developer writes a document called a protocol. This contains key information about how long the trial will run for, what is the risk to participants, what kind of treatment is being investigated, etc.
The tool is open-source under MIT licence and it does not save any of your data.
Currently, professionals at a funding organisation read the protocols and perform a subjective assessment of the trial’s cost, complexity, and risk of ending uninformatively.
One of the most common causes of a trial ending uninformatively is underpowering. There are several indicators of high risk of uninformativeness which can be identified in a protocol, such as a lack of and or an inadequate statistical analysis plan, use of non-standard endpoints, or the use of cluster randomisation. Low-risk trials are often run by well-known institutions with external funding and an international or intercontinental array of sites. These indicators can be referred to as features or parameters.
If you would like to cite the tool alone, you can cite:
Wood TA and McNair D., Clinical Trial Risk Tool: software application using natural language processing to identify the risk of trial uninformativeness. Gates Open Res 2023, 7:56 doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.14416.1.
A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
@article{Wood_2023,
doi = {10.12688/gatesopenres.14416.1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.12688%2Fgatesopenres.14416.1},
year = 2023,
month = {apr},
publisher = {F1000 Research Ltd},
volume = {7},
pages = {56},
author = {Thomas A Wood and Douglas McNair},
title = {Clinical Trial Risk Tool: software application using natural language processing to identify the risk of trial uninformativeness},
journal = {Gates Open Research}
}Blog
Guest post by Youssef Soliman, medical student at Assiut University and biostatistician In today’s complex research environment, managing the finances of a clinical trial is as crucial as managing the science. Dedicated clinical trial financial management software solutions have emerged to oversee the monetary aspects of studies, helping maintain tight budgetary control and regulatory compliance. These platforms typically encompass capabilities like budget creation, real-time expense tracking, automated payments to sites and vendors, and the generation of audit-ready financial reports.
Guest post by Safeer Khan, Lecturer at Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan* Introduction Pilot studies are a cornerstone of modern clinical research. These preliminary trials allow researchers to assess the feasibility of their hypotheses, refine methodologies, and identify potential obstacles before embarking on larger, more expensive trials with significant ethical implications. A well-structured pilot study not only saves time and resources but also reduces the chances of costly failures during later phases of the clinical trial process.
A number of documents are needed to produce a complete and accurate clinical trial budget. The necessary documents typically include: the study protocol (generally the most important document for building a budget) the informed consent form the clinical trial agreement or sponsor contract any laboratory and pharmacy manuals the charge master or schedule of fees the sponsor’s budget. However, sometimes a sponsor will send only the synopsis to a CRO when requesting a quote.